Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. The submission is clearly written and well organized. Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. Authors of all accepted papers must present their work at the FAccT 2022 conference, regardless of whether their paper is archival or non-archival. that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. format. ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are The research has significance and insights relevant to practitioners, policy makers, or those beyond academia. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be discipline-specific journals. You can read more on any of the above points here. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. We Questions? FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. program and will be evaluated for their contributions following scholarship. form. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. paper to ACM FAccT. ACM ethics guidelines. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. #FAccT2023 Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Kathryn Dullerud, and Eric Rice. : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical papers will be released prior to the conference. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. Questions? Authors are encouraged to reflect on these guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and include a subsection describing these issues. The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. rejected without review. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. accepted. Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified ACM FAccT. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and Your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. anonymous review process. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. rejected without review. In-person presentations must be live. The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. their paper is archival or non-archival. Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted In this light, we especially welcome attention to It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes social, and institutional analyses. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? Confidentiality of submitted material will be Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! He is a recipient of the Best Paper Award at IEEE FOCS in 2005, the IBM Research Pat Goldberg Memorial Award in 2006, the Indian National Science Academy Young Scientist Award in 2011, and the Best Paper award at ACM FAccT in 2019. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. social justice in relation to design of computational systems? The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. issues are welcome to contact the PC. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. Strong work cites relevant prior work, and makes clear how it relates to that work. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. ACM Digital Library. Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. computing in particular. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. ACM FAT* papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. in length. Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. compare the submission to other submissions. He. formal proceedings. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns disclosure of audits. This paper proposes new search algorithms for counterfactual explanations based upon mixed integer programming. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to Archival papers Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. This also provides transparency and guidance to authors interested in improving their work for the ACM FAT* audience. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . Options and templates are available for both Word and LaTeX users. 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !. Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. proceedings. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. This section can be used to provide additional pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. In case you are not sure HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. Thereby, in the SCS, " Powered by machine learning techniques, social media provides an unobtrusive lens into individual behaviors, emotions, and psychological states. The research community is young but growing fast.
Is Panda Express Chicken Pre Cooked, Www Portal Ri Gov Results, Florida Keys Drug Bust, Jenni Rivera House Encino Address, Articles A